Categories: Uncategorized

Why build more aircraft carriers?

The Day of Infamy turns me toward thinking about the Navy, Our Navy, and what it needs for the future. I know some of the regulars here are swabbies.

Battleship USS West Virginia sunk and burning at Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941. In background is the battleship USS Tennessee.

Going into WWII, the modern navy needed battleships, even though Billy Mitchell had already proved the massive battlewagons were vulnerable to attacks from the air.

Enter the aircraft carriers, which carried the battle to the enemy in the Pacific. I guess everyone is still onboard.

But — I think the day of the aircraft carrier has passed. They are huge, they are expensive and they are magnets for missiles and drones. They are terribly vulnerable.

In an age of missiles, they are no longer needed to bring U.S. fire power close to enemy shores. Submarines do a better job, at less cost.

As you know, “fighter pilots” fly drones in the Mideast from air bases in the States. They don’t need to fly off a carrier to fight, so why do we need the carriers?

Missiles give us more bang for a smaller buck. Or am I missing something important here?

Stu Bykofsky

Recent Posts

Questions I would ask Kamala Harris

At 2:30 this afternoon at WHYY, Vice President Kamala Harris will be interviewed by members…

4 days ago

From World War II, the last lady of the line

They call her a lucky ship. And a long-living ship. During her service in the…

5 days ago

Kamala Harris was no cream puff

Finally, at long last, after precedent-busting preliminaries, we arrived at the Main Event — the…

1 week ago

Open letter to Mayor Parker on bike lanes

Dear Mayor Parker: So how did it feel to get booed when you said you…

2 weeks ago

R.I.P. James Darren, always a regular guy

We’ve lost another of the South Philly stars of the late ‘50s, and later. This…

2 weeks ago

How the hostage crisis broils Israel

Think the U.S. is politically divided? We are, pretty much 50-50 (or 52 Kamala, 46…

3 weeks ago