What Trump means to say about law and order

Today I am putting on my political advisor hat and will stage an intervention to rescue Donald J. Trump from the law and order mess he has created.

The President explains himself (Photo: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)

(I helped Joe Biden with fracking yesterday.) 

Part of the problem is of his own making, which is true with most of his problems. In brief, the problem is his big mouth (and his Tweeter fingers).

Mr. President, when talking about law and order, Rule #1 is to avoid sports metaphors. When you are talking about a civilian being shot in the back by police and you liken it to a golfer missing a putt, the media will pounce.

When you know most of the media are out to hang you, why hand them a length of rope? 

Also the word “choke.” Lose it. You may mean athletics, but to reporters (who couldn’t make the team), it brings memories of Eric Garner in Staten Island and even George Floyd in Minneapolis. Get the picture?

The more you rattle on, the more mistakes you make. When you are talking, less is more. Have one concrete point to make, make it, and shut up.

The typical American does believe in “law and order.” Yes, progressives prefer to convert that into “justice,” but let them.

You are for justice, too. Aren’t you?

Say so. 

Rule #2 is to condemn wrongdoers from the Right as well as the Left. 

When some live bait is tossed in front of you — such as seeking comment on Kyle Rittenhouse, the 17-year-old vigilante — here’s what you should say: “The investigation is not yet complete. I will have no comment until the results are known.”

There are some phrases the media loves to use, such as you “stoke racial tensions.” So you should avoid allusions to race and take the rope from their hands. 

Remember your comments following Charlottesville? You actually condemned neo-Nazis and white supremacists, but that followed your comment about “very fine people on both sides.” You were talking about the debate over statues, but you handed your enemies another length of rope.

Focus on even-handed law, and steer clear of additional commentary.

If you want to go completely against type, you could express sympathy with the victims of police brutality.

It won’t be easy for you, but it will take the rope out of the hands of the media mob and make for commentary that is more, well, presidential.

It couldn’t hurt.

Stu Bykofsky

Recent Posts

Wow! Inquirer finds opposing viewpoint on bike lanes

Well, the temperature makes it feel like Hell has frozen over, and another sign of…

8 hours ago

Trump mixed fact and fantasy in inaugural

In a generally forward-looking, brusque, and patriotic inaugural address, President Donald J. Trump went off…

2 days ago

A targeted report about guns, gays, and confirmation bias

Not to pick on the Philadelphia Inquirer, but I will use a recent story to…

1 week ago

Helen Ubinas tees off on double-talking mayor

Just minutes after I learned the Sixers Arena deal had collapsed like the team’s playoff…

1 week ago

Saving the lives of pets of those in the military

Buzz Miller was 64 when he had an epiphany. PACT founder Buzz Miller with Ricky…

1 week ago

Reasonable solutions to illegal migrant crisis

This is a slightly edited republication of a March 2022 column on solutions to solve…

1 week ago