Uncategorized

The mayoral forum got good at the end


Tuesday night’s 90-minute Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce mayoral forum saved the best for last, if you hung in until the last 15 minutes.

Jeff Brown (left) and Allan Domb questioned each other

The event was streamed on 6ABC, and at the end solo moderator Matt O’Donnell gave the six participants a chance to ask questions of each other, which turned the forum into something like a debate, and the gloves came off.

Before I report on that, keep in mind this dynamic: Although most informed observers believe five of the six are bunched at the top (Amen Brown is thought to be out of it) the others all know who their primary opponent is, the one they think they have to beat.

The rules dictated each candidate could ask one other candidate a question.

So when Cherelle Parker chose to question Helen Gym, you know she was painting a bull’s eye on her back. And Parker came loaded with a full blunderbuss — the so-called “safe” injection sites that no neighborhood wants.

Parker said Gym was for them, and wanted to know where she would put them. This is a “when did you stop beating your husband” question.

Rather than be direct, Gym said she “wouldn’t take them off the table,” but said that wouldn’t be her first choice. Translation, she’s for them but would first — using a favorite phrase — “lean into” the community for input.

Advantage to Parker.

Amen Brown came to bat next and accused Rebecca Rhynhart of using the word “boys” to describe the two African-American mayors who are supporting her.

Aghast, she called that a lie, and in the commercial I believe Amen was referring to, Rhynhart used the term “guys,” not “boys.”

Point goes to Rhynhart.

Allan Domb then related when he wanted to run for mayor in 2015, political advisors told him to run for Council first, to, learn the ropes. Why didn’t you do that, he asked Jeff Brown, his chief nemesis.

Brown replied that Domb took bad advice and he “got sucked into a system of groupthink.”

Ouch! Point goes to Brown.

To return the favor, Brown wanted to know why the real estate guy proposed doubling the tax abatement for housing, with an implication that Domb was feathering his own nest.

Snap.

But no — the trap didn’t work because Domb said if Brown had bothered to read the bill, he would have seen it was directed at housing under $250,000, which would have benefited lower-income people and help create generational wealth.

Point back to Domb. 

Gym said budgets are “moral documents” and wanted to know why Rhynhart was part of an administration (Michael Nutter’s) that closed firehouses and libraries.

Rhynhart replied in 2008 the city faced its worst-ever fiscal crisis and she helped pull the city through, even while following orders she may not have approved of.

Point to Rhynhart.

Rhynhart returned the favor by asking Gym why she opposed a cut in the business tax that the African-American Chamber of Commerce wanted.

Gym said she believed in “targeted tax cuts,” but earlier said she opposed tax cuts.

I would have preferred this format for the entire 90 minutes, but no one asked me.

Stu Bykofsky

Recent Posts

Inquirer scoreboard: Fails on objectivity, again

As part of my continuing scoreboard on Inquirer corruption of journalist norms, the Thursday edition…

2 days ago

Sixers Arena: Lots of leadership missing, and that’s no accident

[This was published in the Inquirer on Thursday, Dec, 12. The subject is the Sixers…

6 days ago

Nuclear war: Making it thinkable

Not many things scare the crap out of me, including the threat of nuclear war.…

7 days ago

Inquirer scoreboard: It keeps pushing Open Borders

God knows I don’t want to be a noodge about it, but as long as…

1 week ago

The Ivy Leaguer and the Marine: Neither is a hero

By now you have either seen or heard of the online blockheads who are lionizing,…

2 weeks ago

Amnesty International shames itself, again

Once upon a time I was a supporter of, and a contributor to, Amnesty International.…

2 weeks ago