The “don’t shoot” myth

On the fifth anniversary of the death — note that word — of make-believe martyr Michael Brown, two Democratic presidential candidates chose to go willfully insane and trash the facts of the infamous case that gave rise to the fallacious “Hands up, don’t shoot” rallying cry.

That’s quite a mouthful. Let me break it down: In tweets, both Eilzabeth Warren and Kamala Harris described Brown’s death as murder.

Murder is a synonym for homicide. For there to be a murder, there must be a murderer, and in the Brown case, the other party was police officer Darren Wilson. The white police officer did shoot Brown, an 18-year-old African-American who earlier had strong armed a local merchant and stolen cigarellos, a theft that was captured on video.

Michael Brown (left) and Darren Wilson (CBS News)

The hulking Brown then walked  in the middle of a street in Ferguson, Mo., when Wilson rolled up in his SUV  and attempted to question him. A struggle ensued when Brown reached inside the police car and tried to grab Wilson’s gun.

Brown fled after Wilson’s gun was discharged, then turned around and moved back toward Wilson, who felt threatened. He fired, striking Brown six times, and killing him. 

Brown never raised his hands and said, “Don’t shoot.” It did not happen. 

Some of you are so deeply invested in the myth, you won’t believe me. Maybe you will believe Jonathan Capehart, a liberal, African-American member of the Washington Post editorial board. Flat out, he says if you believe Brown raised his hands and tried to surrender, you are believing a lie.

Capehart exhaustively cites chapter and verse. 

Based on the evidence, the Ferguson police department found Wilson blameless. Sure, you say, what do you expect? I understand the skepticism of the cops investigating the cops. 

So the U.S. Department of Justice swooped in. This was not just Barack Obama’s DOJ, it was Attorney General Eric Holder’s DOJ and I imagine him directing his investigators to find the evidence to nail Wilson to a cross.

Lord knows they tried, but they failed. After tedious, detailed interviews with witnesses and scouring DNA and forensic evidence, DOJ found no case that could be made against Wilson. Given the circumstances, his actions were lawful.

DOJ did make a case against the Ferguson police department for actual bigotry. That was an important finding. 

When the two candidates tried to outwoke each other, they directed attention to a lie, and away from the real problem of racism that exists in some (many?) American police departments.

Warren and Harris — herself a former prosecutor trying to make like a boa and shed her prosecutorial skin — grasped at a straw as wrong as the deluded souls who think Mumia Abu-Jamal didn’t murder police officer Daniel Faulkner.

For there to be a murder, there must be a murderer. 

In Daniel Faulkner’s case there was one.

In Michael Brown’s case, there was not. 

Stu Bykofsky

Recent Posts

Wow! Inquirer finds opposing viewpoint on bike lanes

Well, the temperature makes it feel like Hell has frozen over, and another sign of…

6 hours ago

Trump mixed fact and fantasy in inaugural

In a generally forward-looking, brusque, and patriotic inaugural address, President Donald J. Trump went off…

2 days ago

A targeted report about guns, gays, and confirmation bias

Not to pick on the Philadelphia Inquirer, but I will use a recent story to…

1 week ago

Helen Ubinas tees off on double-talking mayor

Just minutes after I learned the Sixers Arena deal had collapsed like the team’s playoff…

1 week ago

Saving the lives of pets of those in the military

Buzz Miller was 64 when he had an epiphany. PACT founder Buzz Miller with Ricky…

1 week ago

Reasonable solutions to illegal migrant crisis

This is a slightly edited republication of a March 2022 column on solutions to solve…

1 week ago