It has begun — the Philadelphia School District is dumbing down its elite schools in the name of “equity,” prying open doors to those who couldn’t get in under rules that demanded and created excellence.
The (vague) new policies for student admission, announced in the fall, are a transparent attempt to rebalance the racial mix at elite schools such as Central and Masterman using a predetermined, but unannounced, formula. Turning Dr. Martin Luther King on his head, the color of students’ skin becomes more important than the content of their intellect.
We are looking at an “equity” that makes everyone the same — the undeserving and the deserving, the unqualified and the qualified.
The little we know about the new policies was provided by the Philadelphia Inquirer last fall, in a story lacking necessary detail, while acknowledging the School District stonewalled on some issues.
I know the feeling.
Since December I have been trying get straight answers out of the School District, first through communications officer Christina Clark.
She pointed me to some online information, such as a generalized letter to parents lacking specifics about what the hell is going on, and a video of an October news announcement of the School Selection Process, that I think of as the Asian Removal Program. I will explain that in a moment.
The October 6 announcement revealed that standardized tests have been dropped — no reason given (but we suspect they are somehow Eurocentric and racist), and that “some” schools (not mentioned by name) will still require a writing sample. The writing sample will be graded by computers, not by humans, said the School District, to free grading from the naked bigotry of American humans. (Small problem: Humans program the computers.)
Several “special admit” schools were conveying a message that “was not accurate,” said Student Support Services Chief Karen Lynch, who did not reveal what that inaccurate message was, but, we suspect she was referring to racial imbalance.
The facts: In 2020, Central’s 2,400 students were 38.7% Asian, 28.3% white, 19.6% Black,7.5% Hispanic, and 6.5% multiracial. The District itself is 52% Black, 22% Hispanic, 13% white, 7% Asian, 5% other.
You see the message that needs correcting, don’t you? Student enrollment doesn’t match the racial balance. There are way too many Asians.
This “equity” is an attack on them as obvious as the shameful Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 that prohibited Chinese immigration. What we have today is the 21st Century version of the Yellow Peril.
In the past, kids were admitted on the color-blind basis of good grades, good attendance, good behavior. Maybe good test scores, too, but the School District solved that problem by getting rid of the tests.
“Humane education is to meet students at their level,” which this does not, said Councilmember David Oh, a Central alum and the first Asian-American elected to that body.
He disapproved of the changes, and joined with six other Council members, Black and white, to ask the School District to suspend the changes due to “lack of transparency” and “ambiguous supporting data.” (The other Asian-American member of City Council, the quarrelsome Helen Gym, did not respond to a request for comment.)
Masterman and Central have for decades been the jewels in the crown of Philadelphia public education. Their graduates constitute a Who’s Who of Philadelphia achievement.
They are the antidote for white flight, magnets that bind the middle- and upper-class to a public education system that otherwise scares the living hell out of them.
There are 39 magnet schools that draw students from around the city, but I’m focusing on just Central and Masterman, which in School District lingo are “criteria-based.”
For the first time, students for the “criteria-based” schools will be chosen by “a lottery-based process,” said Lynch, casually dismembering the concept of “criteria,” as in merit.
Students who “meet the criteria,” which she did not specify, will be selected by lottery, which is random luck, like winning a turkey raffle.
“There will also be a zip code preference at several of our schools,” she said, without naming the schools or the zip codes.
It was a master class in generalities and double talk, being oh-so-careful to avoid any hint that a big fat thumb is being put on the scale to benefit
nonwhite “disadvantaged” students who live in the “wrong” zip code.
The changes are unwelcome to almost all Central alumni I reached by Tweeting out a request for comment.
Attorney Richard Lipow, 67, class of 1971, said, “Reducing academic standards for admission and or the rigor of study would not be good for the students.”
“I’ve read the proposed changes to the selection process, and I believe it does more harm than good,” said Joe Melloni, 38, a national sales rep. “Children should be taught that they earn things by their hard work and merits. To lessen requirements and allow children to enter a school they might be ill prepared for will damage them emotionally and mentally,” said Melloni, class of 2001.
A 49-year-old Black man who requested anonymity because he is an active-duty Philadelphia police officer, said he is unhappy about the changes that “ultimately set some students up for failure.”
He said, “I believe in equity of opportunity which already exists. Everyone can take the test, and everyone can do whatever it takes to be successful on that test despite any obstacles that are placed before them,” said the officer.
When pharmaceutical executive Jeff Morrison, 46, class of 1993, attended Central, “It was the absolute gold standard of academics and diversity . . . I think the demographic breakdown was 35/35/20/10 or something like that,” he said.
“Everyone got along and straight up liked one another. Our yearbook lists home addresses of all students — every single zip code was represented,” he said.
“Whatever changes are being made are hurting the integrity of the school,” said Johnny Looch, 51, a DJ who was in the class of 1989.
Isabelle Ringing, class of 1999, a 40-year-old pharmacist said, “Everybody is outraged.”
“Demographic statistics regarding Central and Masterman are quite alarming given the demographics of the Philadelphia public school system,” said Elliott Weiss, 67, class of 1971, a retired professor at the University of Virginia.
“We are not lowering standards, we are measuring different factors,” he said, expressing a minority view, pun intended.
Maybe the School District should hire Weiss, because my request to have a face-to-face interview with a School District official was rebuffed.
Email requests for information to two Central High School Alumni Association officers also were ignored. Why? Just a guess — complaining about anything tagged “equity” is automatically “racist” to the woke.
Here are the questions on my mind, “racism” be damned.
What was actually wrong with the long-standing school selection process?
If there were “too few” minorities in elite schools, what is the “correct” racial distribution?
Is a racial distribution formula applied to the teaching staff, which is almost 70% white?
When did Asians cease being minorities?
Instead of spending money on diversity, inclusion and equity officers, how about funding studies of Asian students? Is it something in their water, in their noodles, in their homes, in their culture, that results in achievement? Can their experience be replicated?
The School District now is rigging the system to restrict two groups — Asians and whites — to benefit two other groups, Blacks and browns.
Tests were eliminated in the name of equity.
But at the High School for Creative and Performing Arts — for artists, actors, dancers, musicians — students will still have to audition to demonstrate talent. Is that equitable?
How about sports teams fielded by high schools? Will Overbrook have a few white basketball players for “equity”? Any room for Asian football linemen at Dobbins?
Kidding aside, the School District’s desire seems aimed at giving some students a shot, but it is going about it in the wrong way — by lowering the bar.
It is the equity of the lowest common denominator.
18 thoughts on “School District selects racism for elite schools”
I agree with everything in article. My daughter is a junior at Central. The president/ principal resigning in April to pursue job at school district headquarters. Almost seems like a setup, give principal a higher paying less stressful job and make way for a “ selected “ new principal with same interests as school boards new theories.
Sigh. This is outrageous. Keep it up Philadelphia and watch the further circling the drain. It is so sad to see this happening, especially looking at the booming Research Triangle in NC where we are now. Excellent schools, highly educated and diverse population, Apple, Google and a myriad of other companies moving here. Maybe the city administration would like some lessons on how to move forward rather than backward from this state.
HAPPY THURSDAY !!!
I guess it was a million years ago, or so it seems, that we were young. During that time, “woke” meant GET OUT OF BED OR YOU’LL BE LATE FOR SCHOOL ! Not that mom ever yelled at us…………(sic).
In today’s world, to be an achiever, you have to sell the best drugs, making you rich. You have to kiss up to the right people to stimulate the cash flow. About the only education you need today, is where to buy a gun, how to use a scale and who can I get for a bodyguard.
This country is heading to hell in a handbasket.
DRAIN THE SWAMP ! and VOTE THEM ALL OUT !
Woke and equity policies are squashing American excellence. The socialists are ruling Philadelphia. The future looks bleak. Maybe the courts can change or stop this unfair selection process to our public schools. The alternatives are inter-act schools, Quaker schools or Catholic schools. However the price tag is large. Good luck challenging the school board over this issue.
The public (voters) should make themselves heard
I am grateful to have two children who graduated from Masterman (Class of 2020 and Class of 2011). I believe they both got a quality of academic education second to none, including the many fine private schools in our region. They also got something that private schools simply cannot provide: a critically important exposure to a diverse socio-economic set of fellow students. Just like Central, the demographics did not mirror Philadelphia’s population, but it did reflect it. White kids, Black Kids, Brown Kids – name a color, and its at Masterman. My kids had classmates who were from the 1%, and classmates whose families really struggled economically eveyday (as so many do in Philadelphia).
We have proudly and loudly held out Masterman as the outstanding example of how excellent public education can be. Paramount among the attributes that make Masterman outstanding is its high standards. We must continue to push for equitable engagement of all children in our best schools, but lose the high standards, and we have lost the war.
Raise your voice against the changes that will ruin the school
In 1961, Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. published “Harrison Bergeron”, a short story set in the year 2081.
In the story, all Americans are equal in every way imaginable. Even professional ballerinas are required to wear masks and weights on their shoes so that no dancer is more beautiful or more graceful than the next.
Vonnegut intended it as satire, not a how-to manual.
I urge everyone to read “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut. The story addresses the issue of correcting ‘inequality’ by imposing punishment on those who are skilled. E.g., a great ballet artist must wear weights and chains, to prevent those who can’t dance from feeling bad about themselves. Vonnegut must have seen Philadelphia’s actions vis a vis its great schools in a nightmare.
What if these kids of equity can’t keep up? Will they then lower the passing grades? Who will this help? 🤔 The same people who are for crt never think critically. As long as ones intentions are good, I suppose, is all that matters.
Either the standards for lowered, or the slower kids will fail, harming their self esteem.
A “lose” either way.
“Don’t raise the bridge, lower the river!”
Students who buy into education create a good school. Students who are in the building to disrupt and destroy the learning process for their fellow classmates create a BAD school.
Asian Removal Program. Has to be one of your funniest lines ever!
Not to Asians, but thanks.
You are correct again, Stu. I am an alumnus of Central and as you know Asian American. I agree with your viewpoint. The changes by the School District has the effect of pitting minorities against each other in the name of diversity. There needs to be more open and transparent discussions about this very important issue for all of Philly.
To my surprise, the Sunday Inquirer carried an op-ed piece saying the School District screwed it up, but avoided any mention of race.
Comments are closed.