Politics

No Oscar for De Niro’s street scrum

As an unpaid (and unrequested) unofficial advisor to the Joe Biden campaign who has made previous suggestions, such as here  and here I have to call the freelance appearance of Robert De Niro an unforced error.

Robert De Niro argues with a heckler (Photo: CBS News)

Lots of reasons why.

First, the Biden campaign said it would not comment on the ongoing Donald J. Trump trial/fiasco melodrama.

It then broke its word and did, violating the rule that when the enemy is shooting himself in the head, do not remove his gun and move focus away from his possibly illegal actions.

(And, yes, possibly illegal because the jury has not yet decided. I know this is tough on the TDS people, but everyone is presumed innocent.) 

Second, unleashing De Niro had several negatives.

A- He’s ranted and raved all over the media before, exploding anti-Trump F bombs wherever he goes. We’ve seen that movie before. Passion is one thing, panic is another. The other day he quickly moved from Trump will destroy democracy, to Trump will destroy America, to Trump will destroy the entire world. Tomorrow, the solar system?

B- He apparently wrote his own lines, which underscores why Hollywood needs professional writers. His script was no Gettysburg Address.

C- He didn’t bother to memorize it, and then broke the fourth wall, in a sense, by arguing with a heckler, who knocked him off his script. That exchange reduced him from an Oscar winner to someone in a street scrum. His performance was more  “Meet the Fockers” than “Killers of the Flower Moon.” Not a good look. 

D- Using De Niro played into the familiar Republican canard (that happens to be true) that Hollywood is run by Democrats, and also that it poisons our culture (which is only partially true). 

Third, De Niro is an example of the Progressive Elite, which is not where most Americans stand. (I must note the GOP does not have the same disdain for Hollywood when it produces stars on the conservative side of politics, such as Clint Eastwood, Jon Voight, and Kelsey Grammer.)

I doubt the endorsement of any star will result in more votes for any candidate.

Except maybe Taylor Swift.

—-

Final piece of advice: When the Trump jury delivers its verdict, read the same statement, whether it is guilty or not guilty:

We have faith in America’s judicial system and we accept the decision of the jury. Now we look forward to resuming the campaign.

That’s called the high road. Don’t look for cheap political advantage. Don’t give Trump ammunition.

If the trial ends in a hung jury, as I have predicted, say nothing. Because, what can you say?

Stu Bykofsky

Recent Posts

Life in a shelter, from a dog’s point of view

A shelter is about the worst place for a dog, and Philadelphia’s was once one…

1 day ago

No, Americans did not vote for fascism

The post mortem continues, with the Inquirer headlining, in the print edition, a story ,…

1 week ago

How can Trump make mass deportation work?

Donald J. Trump has a mandate for action, and if Republicans capture the House, in…

1 week ago

Ladies & Gentlemen: You are embarrassing yourselves

As you know, I enjoy spirited debate, and even creative name-calling. The election is over.…

1 week ago

Trump’s first appointment seems to troll Mark Cuban

Well, ain’t that something. In what I can’t help seeing as a trolling of Mark…

1 week ago

What Trump’s victory is telling Democrats

Has Tom Hanks packed his bags yet? The once and future president (Photo: AP) No,…

2 weeks ago