Uncategorized

Is this cartoon racist, or just impolite?

Cartoonist Michael Ramirez is a progressive’s worst nightmare.

In addition to a tightly focused conservative world view, his acid-dipped pen produces work that is simultaneously insightful and somewhat insulting. Like this one:

This appeared in the Washington Post, for which the two-time Pulitzer Prize-winner draws twice a week, along with other outlets.

After publishing it, the Post took it down, responding to some complaints that it was “racist.” 

I see it as accurate, and condemning Hamas, but racist?

OK — I can see some argument in that Ramirez portrayed an actual Hamas spokesman in an unflattering light. The subject is portrayed with an exaggerated nose and other distorted features.  

He did the same recently to Rashid Tlaib, a member of the Hamas Caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Not very flattering, I will admit. But Tlaib starts out looking like the south end of a northbound horse.

So I am biased against loudmouth Leftist women?

Nope, the squirrelly socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is quite dishy. Her opinions don’t change her appearance.

So maybe it is Ramirez who is the bigot?

Nope. He is a patriot. Yet, this is how he depicted the Statue of Liberty:

Not that attractive, with that exaggerated, unflattering nose.

Because, as the first word I used on the post, he is a cartoonist, which gives him some latitude.

This is how Ramirez draws former President Barack Obama,

‘I’m cracking down on those who violate federal gun laws!!’

Racist? I don’t think so.

So he just is insulting with his art toward terrorists and Democrats? 

Check out Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell, next to President Joe Biden:

Not to mention Russian dictator President Vladimir Putin, and one of his generals.

So you can see what Ramirez’s style is. 

Not flattering, but not racist, either.

As a private business, the Post was free to change its mind and take down the cartoon. It issued some statement talking about the cartoon lacking inclusiveness.

The problem is that cartoons are no more supposed to be inclusive than this column. Ramirez expresses a singular point of view. 

Cartoons are not supposed to be inclusive, Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Signe Wilkinson told me. “It’s supposed to be what you believe in.”

Some people get it. 

On his Saturday CNN show, Michael Smerconish did a segment on this issue, and polled his Left-leaning audience. An overwhelming  80%+ felt the Post was wrong to delete the cartoon.

As did Signe. A better response, she said, is to post more cartoons representing more points of view.

That’s the way free speech is supposed to work: Addition, not subtraction.

Stu Bykofsky

Recent Posts

A taxing story on Philly’s soda tax

Philadelphia’s seven-year-old soda tax has increased health in the city, but maybe not, according to…

1 day ago

Life in a shelter, from a dog’s point of view

A shelter is about the worst place for a dog, and Philadelphia’s was once one…

5 days ago

No, Americans did not vote for fascism

The post mortem continues, with the Inquirer headlining, in the print edition, a story ,…

2 weeks ago

How can Trump make mass deportation work?

Donald J. Trump has a mandate for action, and if Republicans capture the House, in…

2 weeks ago

Ladies & Gentlemen: You are embarrassing yourselves

As you know, I enjoy spirited debate, and even creative name-calling. The election is over.…

2 weeks ago

Trump’s first appointment seems to troll Mark Cuban

Well, ain’t that something. In what I can’t help seeing as a trolling of Mark…

2 weeks ago