Updating a story published on Jan. 24, 2024:
Crusading lawyer George Bochetto, who brought suit against the city on behalf of the Frank L. Rizzo Monument Committee, tells me a deal to return the statue to its rightful owner will be signed “within the next few days.”
The city will pay a “substantial sum” to cover cost of repairing the statue, which is not an admission of guilt, Bochetto says, even though he says the city violated an agreement with the committee.
The statue will not be returned immediately, as the agreement between the city and the committee must be approved by the Philadelphia Art Commission, and that could take months. While that is continuing, Bochetto is organizing a citizens committee to raise funds and also to choose a permanent location for the statue. [Full disclosure: I have accepted Bochetto’s invitation to join the committee.]
—-
Bochetto filed suit against the city in July 2020 alleging improper treatment of the statue, which had been erected in 1998. You may recall the Frank Rizzo statue was unlawfully removed in the middle of the night by gutless Mayor Jim Kenney.
The city’s law department declined to comment because the law suit is still active.
The outline of the surrender was agreed to in the dying days of Kenney’s administration.
Could this be a sudden awakening that unrestrained Political Correctness and cancel culture is wrong?
Nah. More likely the city feared another legal ass-kicking in court. Bochetto previously had beaten the city’s unlawful attempt to take down the statue of Christopher Columbus in South Philly’s Marconi Park.
In the wake of the George Floyd riots, which hapless Kenney allowed to happen here through inaction, the mayor acted on the progressive belief that Rizzo was a bigot and a brute, and that Columbus was guilty of genocide. This is part of the progressive internal belief system, based on feelings rather than facts. Progressives believe shouting “racist” settles every argument. It does not.
Funds for the statue were raised privately, led by prominent Democrats such as Mayor Ed Rendell and D.A. Lynne Abraham. All of whom were prominent racists, of course. Maybe they were aware that Rizzo had found funds to build the African-American History Museum, had integrated two-man police cars, and his own security team included two Black officers.
He had been endorsed for mayor by the Black Clergy of Philadelphia & Vicinity, those vicious racists.
After Rizzo’s death, Kenney actually wanted to rename the Municipal Services Building after the late mayor and police commissioner who had devoted his entire life to public service.
Sometime later, Kenney attended progressive reeducation camp and emerged from his cocoon of South Philly Mummer and rowhouse kid as a rainbow butterfly rejecting both the Mummers and South Philly.
While Columbus has become a controversial historical figure, he is being judged by today’s sensibilities, rather than by the norms of his time. That is called presentism.
For Rizzo, the fig leaf that weasel Kenney used to cover his blatant virtue signaling was the laughable claim that the statue’s removal was due to concerns about “public safety.” As if the Rizzo statue was going to climb down off the steps of the Municipal Services Building and beat up passersby.
Or maybe Kenney meant the statue might fall on and injure one of the self-appointed vigilantes who vandalized the likeness of the city’s first Italian-American mayor.
The progressive hatred of the mayor was so deep on the left that the Inquirer’s Chicken Little columnist Will Bunch described the Rizzo statue’s friendly wave as a fascist salute. Which must have come as a big surprise to sculptor Zeno Frudakis.
Almost every time I have written about the Rizzo statue — about a half a dozen times — I’ve made the point that Kenney is a chicken-legged Woke coward who acted unlawfully.
The proof was included in Bochetto’s lawsuit.
When the Frank L. Rizzo Monument Committee gifted the statue to the city in 1998, both parties signed an agreement, and that 7-page agreement was broken, according to Bochetto’s lawsuit.
His complaint charges that the committee’s due process rights were violated.
The statue was “removed under the cover of night,” the suit alleges, with no process or public input “or approval from the Philadelphia Art Commission, as required by the Philadelphia Home Rule Charter.”
The suit calls for an injunction against the city to prevent destroying the statue, to return it to its owners, and monetary damages.
The agreement stated that “if the city shall at any time decide… to dispose of the work, it shall give notice to the provider and offer the provider a reasonable opportunity to recover the work.”
That did not happen.
The complaint alleges the agreement required the city make the statue available for recovery, which it did not do.
All unlawfully, Bochetto said in the complaint.
And, basically, the city now reportedly agrees.
There remain questions, such as when the transfer will take place. The statue reportedly is in a city warehouse in the Northeast.
Where will it go? Probably not on city land because it’s a magnet for midnight Social Justice Vandals who demonstrate heroism by attacking a statue.
That’s a decision the citizens committee will make.
Continuing with a conversation with God going back a quarter of a century. Your Favorite…
I once wrote, with sincerity, that Philadelphians divide their time between bragging about Philly, and…
As part of my continuing scoreboard on Inquirer corruption of journalist norms, the Thursday edition…
[This was published in the Inquirer on Thursday, Dec, 12. The subject is the Sixers…
Not many things scare the crap out of me, including the threat of nuclear war.…
God knows I don’t want to be a noodge about it, but as long as…