Far Left writers go bonkers in laying blame for attacks

I’m having a chuckle about a couple of chuckleheads from the Left — the Inquirer’s Will Bunch, Salon’s Amanda Marcotte — coming out with the, um, imaginative theory that the New Orleans and Las Vegas whack jobs who committed unrelated and dissimilar crimes were linked by a common motive — male toxicity.

This theory comes from the slice of the political spectrum that can’t even define what a woman is. I mean, just ask them. They can’t, because they live in an ideological burrow, dug mostly by academics and nutty progressives who want to convince you science is wrong, that your gender is anything you say it is on any day of the week.

And from the party that unsuccessfully tried to convince America that Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, he of the exaggerated hand motions and the camo cap, represented a new definition of masculinity.

I guess the two writers chose male rage because their first choice, racism, wasn’t available. This wasn’t a first for Marcotte. Last April she did a stupid piece for Salon that blamed the unprovoked attacks on New York City women on the male rage of MAGA men. Without a shred of evidence.

And by all means let’s not talk about what Shamsud-Din Jabbar said actually did motivate him — allegiance to the Islamic terror group ISIS. 

That’s not a call neither Bunch nor Marcotte would dare make.