Let’s go crazy for a minute and imagine the city wants to honor Mayor Jim Kenney by commissioning a statue. Maybe bronze, maybe marble, maybe Crisco, whatever.
Now let’s imagine a handful of sculptors were invited to present their ideas. And let’s further imagine that all of them were white.
Can you imagine that? I can’t. It would violate the city’s well-known commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion.
It would be, well, you know, racist.
With that in mind, we look at the city’s announcement last week that five “semi-finalists” have been selected to compete to execute a statue of famous abolitionist Harriett Tubman.
All five are Black.
A curious coincidence, or flat-out racism?
Before you make up your mind, here is the background.
After Wesley Wofford’s bronze sculpture of Harriett Tubman was on display here, to rave reviews from the public during a three-month display outside City Hall, the city’s Office of Arts, Culture and the Creative Economy (a.k.a. Creative Philadelphia) offered Wofford a $500,000 commission to create a similar, permanent monument to stand in the same place.
That’s when the molten bronze hit the fan.
Why? Wofford is white.
The offer was quickly withdrawn, and maybe justifiably so, because the commission was offered with no competition. But the city did have a finished work of his that was loved.
Wofford’s name is not among the five, even though it was his excellent sculpture that sparked the desire for a Philadelphia statue. How can that be?
No, this isn’t an expression of “white fragility” — the award-winning Wofford will survive.
It is a question directed at city leaders: How can it be a good thing to make race a key component of decision-making when it comes to art?
I can hear one response: Tubman was an important Black historical figure and her image should be entrusted only to a Black artist.
OK. Let’s apply that standard to others and see what happens.
Sidney Kimmel may be the biggest philanthropist in the history of this city. His name is on everything from performing arts centers to university buildings to hospital wings.
At some point, someone will want to commission a statue of him.
Kimmel is Jewish. Should the competition be limited only to Jewish artists?
As a Jew, I would find that insulting, and limiting. In the vast universe of possibilities, a Christian might have the best design. Or a Muslim. Isn’t what is “the best” our goal?
As to Black artists, yes, I acknowledge past discrimination might have limited their reach. The five Black semi-finalist sculptors have achieved prominence despite that. Do they feel threatened by Wofford’s work?
The city’s goal should be to acquire the best possible statue. I’m not sure the competition should even be limited to American artists.
But artists of only one race?
Decisions made solely on the basis of race is racism, straight up.
I once wrote, with sincerity, that Philadelphians divide their time between bragging about Philly, and…
As part of my continuing scoreboard on Inquirer corruption of journalist norms, the Thursday edition…
[This was published in the Inquirer on Thursday, Dec, 12. The subject is the Sixers…
Not many things scare the crap out of me, including the threat of nuclear war.…
God knows I don’t want to be a noodge about it, but as long as…
By now you have either seen or heard of the online blockheads who are lionizing,…