I have long been on record as rejecting the idea that America suffers from “systemic racism.”
Do we suffer from some racism? Yes.
But does the system — meaning our laws — support it?
No.
But some governments do practice racism, and they are not always in the South. And the victims aren’t always Black.
Last December, the Boston mayor, an Asian woman, hosted a party for members of the City Council.
Not all of them. White members were excluded. When that became public and some complaints were filed, the state attorney general said it did not violate public accommodation laws because members of the public were not invited. It was an example of tightrope walking.
The AG is Andrea Campbell, she is Black and a former member of the City Council.
Mayor Michelle Wu alibied explained the “no whites” party was a “longstanding” tradition.
Like slavery was a longstanding tradition, Ms Wu? How about the Chinese Exclusion Act, a racist federal ban that went on for a decade?
This Boston flap was fresh in my mind when I learned the Philadelphia City Council was organizing a Reparations Task Force to study the issue of reparations, something I am familiar with, and have written about.
The committee was looking for people with experience in eight fields, including activism, social justice, reparatory justice.
Oh. No whites need apply.
Of course they didn’t actually come out and say it that way. Instead, they said the Task Force “shall comprise 10 members from the descendant group who reside in the City of Philadelphia, and have done so for at least a decade.”
There is no payment for work done for the task force.
Elsewhere it said — and this is important — “Philadelphians who are the descendants of enslaved Africans in the United States, the descendants of Black, Negro, or Colored Americans since 1865, and/or the descendants of Freedmen emancipayed from slavery are invited to apply for eight open positions…”
In other words, whites need not apply. If you were white, your qualification were erased by your skin color. This is racism. The committee is apartheid.
Unlike Boston, this was soliciting members of the public. Just excluding white ones.
I decided to test it.
I filed a discrimination complaint with the City Commission on Human Relations, and this is where the story gets sticky.
I was told I would hear back in about 6 weeks. I waited, and when I didn’t hear from it, I showed up at its Washington Square office in person to get a report.
The report I got was this: Since the Commission works very closely with Philadelphia City Council, it felt it should recuse itself.
Hmmm. That gives City Council a carte blanche to be as discriminatory as it likes.
There was one other avenue open to me — the state human relations commission.
I submitted my complaint, supported by evidence, meaning the published invitation for nonwhites only. You saw the text above: “Philadelphians who are the descendants of enslaved Africans in the United States, the descendants of Black, Negro, or Colored Americans since 1865, and/or the descendants of Freedmen emancipated from slavery are invited to apply for eight open positions…”
It is in black and white. To me, it was a smoking gun.
To the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, I had no case, and its reasoning was laughable.
Intake investigator Inna Zudilina said the commission rejected my complaint because I had not filed for the position, and had not been rejected.
In a telephone conversation, she asked me why I had not applied for the position.
I replied something to the effect that I am not an idiot who believes in wasting his time. The language from the committee was absolutely clear that no white person would be considered. I had about the same chance of becoming a forward in the Women’s National Basketball Assn.
In a letter, Zudilina wrote, “You did not submit a formal application to or contact the City of Philadelphia to inquire about or express an interest in the position.”
And because I did not submit an application for a job City Council said was closed to me, I did not get a rejection which would have been “essential.”
Zudilina and I danced for a few minutes on the phone, with my position being it was pointless to apply for a job closed to me, and hers being, I should have, that the plain discriminatory language was not enough. There had to be an action.
It all brought me back to a hearing I covered in 2008, when the city commission hauled Joey Vento into a hearing based on (the falsehood that) his Geno’s steak shop did not serve customers who could not speak English. His business displayed a sign that read, “This is America: When Ordering, Please speak English.”
For the record, the Philadelphia Inquirer often neglected the word “please” in its reports.
The city commission had a problem: No one had complained about being denied service, so the commission brought the case itself and itself could not produce anyone who was denied service. Not even a member of its hapless staff.
That’s because no one ever was denied service.
Owner Vento was not an idiot. He would not turn away business. Counter workers were told if a customer couldn’t articulate an order, they’d be served a standard cheesesteak.
Now, the city and state commissions are not the same.
I just note, for the record, the city commission was able to launch a days-long hearing based on no complaints, (the case was dismissed) while the state was perfectly content to go blind when confronting blatantly racist language that once might have said “Blacks need not apply.”
I’ll survive. But I decided not to allow this reverse discrimination to pass without comment.
A+ on this piece. Eagerly waiting to read responses. Will be checking throughout the day.
Me too. 😄
So often you hear the reply that “blacks can’t be racist” when topics like this arise. This is becoming the norm with offices and committees with the outcome being “well thems the breaks”. Had the color words been reversed there would have been an inquest and then a “peaceful protest” to address the blatant racism. Hopefully, your article will bring more light to the situation but I think the outcome will be a letdown.
The “Blacks can’t racist” is one of the more absurd ideas to come out of academia.
There is no discrimination in the black communities when it comes to homicide. Year after year approximately 80% of the people murdered are black and approximately 80% of the killers are black. Maybe city council and the mayor should be spending time on ways to curb the killings going on in the council districts of these black councilpersons. The Mayor is more interested in keeping the Building Trades Union President Ryan Boyer (a big political contributor) to the mayors political campaign, happy by building the new 76ers arena. I think preventing 16 year olds from getting gunned down in the streets is more important than putting together a 10 person reparations committee.
For the record, most whites are killed by whites. Homicide is usually among the same race.
That’s not the point…The point is 80% of the killings in our city are done by blacks. The almost all black city council and the black mayor do nothing.They are more interested in getting reparations (free money) than savings lives.
First if all, Council has made no demands. It created a task force. My complaint is that it is racist.
As for who murders whom, I was trying to give you an out so you don’t come off as racist.
Sorry Stu but no matter what you say JR is does, in my opinion, come off as a racist.
You are entitled to your opinion, which does not make it fact. I am loathe to throw around words like “racist” and “anti-Semite” without ironclad proof. They are too toxic. And, of course, I have been called racist.
I’m not a racist just a realist who calls things as I see them.
I did not say you were a racist. Go back and read it again. I am careful with language.
Just because you see things in a certain way does not mean you are correct nor doesn’t mean you are not a racist.
Yet again you have provided compelling evidence that reaffirms my decision to leave the city and take my tax dollars with me
The absurdity at both the city and state level is appalling to this aged hippie. But if you dig deep enough, you’ll find absurdity everywhere. The say democracy is messy, but still beats other forms of government. I’ve come to believe that to be true.
Spot on
All I know is that this nonsense doesn’t happen on the right side of the aisle. Perhaps it’s because the right side hasn’t had any power in about 70 years, and maybe they would act like this if they were the only political party in town.
But if everyone is OK with this sort of thing, keep voting for that one party.
The “right side” is content with banning books and abortion. 🙂
Only some radicals want to keep books from public libraries. Most of us just want to keep BJ instructional books from 7-year-olds and prevent the killing of innocent human life.
One Big Problem in American life is the extremists — Left and Right.
Each is convinced only THEY are correct. Try not to be one.
It’s typical over-correction. We run to extremes in trying to over-compensate for a problem. Any such commission should represent the entire community, which will have to pay any form of reparations that might be enacted into law. All points of view should be heard even though the feelings and experiences of those whose ancestors were enslaved should indeed be a significant part of the discussion.
🎯
Point made: racism is wrong no matter who is doing it.
Again, excellent reporting, Stu.
What this ‘reparations’ thing is really about is legally feeding from the public trough — except whites will be denied a place to feed on the tax dollarss. Blacks will fill the trough with whilte tax dollars, and blacks will feed greedily, having been fed the lie that today’s whites are guilty for what yesterday’s whites did years and years ago. The fracturing of the nation continues unabated.
Wanna bet a lunch? I say no Black descendants will ever get a check.